Unpacking Software Livestream

Join our monthly Unpacking Software livestream to hear about the latest news, chat and opinion on packaging, software deployment and lifecycle management!

Learn More

Chocolatey Product Spotlight

Join the Chocolatey Team on our regular monthly stream where we put a spotlight on the most recent Chocolatey product releases. You'll have a chance to have your questions answered in a live Ask Me Anything format.

Learn More

Chocolatey Coding Livestream

Join us for the Chocolatey Coding Livestream, where members of our team dive into the heart of open source development by coding live on various Chocolatey projects. Tune in to witness real-time coding, ask questions, and gain insights into the world of package management. Don't miss this opportunity to engage with our team and contribute to the future of Chocolatey!

Learn More

Calling All Chocolatiers! Whipping Up Windows Automation with Chocolatey Central Management

Webinar from
Wednesday, 17 January 2024

We are delighted to announce the release of Chocolatey Central Management v0.12.0, featuring seamless Deployment Plan creation, time-saving duplications, insightful Group Details, an upgraded Dashboard, bug fixes, user interface polishing, and refined documentation. As an added bonus we'll have members of our Solutions Engineering team on-hand to dive into some interesting ways you can leverage the new features available!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey Community Coffee Break

Join the Chocolatey Team as we discuss all things Community, what we do, how you can get involved and answer your Chocolatey questions.

Watch The Replays
Chocolatey and Intune Overview

Webinar Replay from
Wednesday, 30 March 2022

At Chocolatey Software we strive for simple, and teaching others. Let us teach you just how simple it could be to keep your 3rd party applications updated across your devices, all with Intune!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey For Business. In Azure. In One Click.

Livestream from
Thursday, 9 June 2022

Join James and Josh to show you how you can get the Chocolatey For Business recommended infrastructure and workflow, created, in Azure, in around 20 minutes.

Watch On-Demand
The Future of Chocolatey CLI

Livestream from
Thursday, 04 August 2022

Join Paul and Gary to hear more about the plans for the Chocolatey CLI in the not so distant future. We'll talk about some cool new features, long term asks from Customers and Community and how you can get involved!

Watch On-Demand
Hacktoberfest Tuesdays 2022

Livestreams from
October 2022

For Hacktoberfest, Chocolatey ran a livestream every Tuesday! Re-watch Cory, James, Gary, and Rain as they share knowledge on how to contribute to open-source projects such as Chocolatey CLI.

Watch On-Demand

Downloads:

12,855

Downloads of v 0.87.1:

74

Last Update:

22 Nov 2024

Published Date:

22 Nov 2024

Package Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/Nexus-Mod-Manager/graphs/contributors

Tags:

nmm nexus mod mods manager nexusmodmanager nexus-mod-manager modmanager mod-manager nexusmods modding admin

Nexus Mod Manager

(Ready for review)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

0.87.1 | Updated: 22 Nov 2024

Downloads:

12,855

Downloads of v 0.87.1:

74

Published:

22 Nov 2024

Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/Nexus-Mod-Manager/graphs/contributors

Nexus Mod Manager 0.87.1

(Ready for review)

Legal Disclaimer: Neither this package nor Chocolatey Software, Inc. are affiliated with or endorsed by https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/Nexus-Mod-Manager/graphs/contributors. The inclusion of https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/Nexus-Mod-Manager/graphs/contributors trademark(s), if any, upon this webpage is solely to identify https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/Nexus-Mod-Manager/graphs/contributors goods or services and not for commercial purposes.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Some Checks Have Failed or Are Not Yet Complete

Not All Tests Have Passed


Validation Testing Passed


Verification Testing Passed

Details

Scan Testing Resulted in Flagged as a Note:

At least one file within this package has greater than 0 detections, but less than 5

Details
IMPORTANT

This version is in moderation and has not yet been approved. This means it doesn't show up under normal search.

  • Until approved, you should consider this package version unsafe - it could do very bad things to your system (it probably doesn't but you have been warned, that's why we have moderation).
  • This package version can change wildly over the course of moderation until it is approved. If you install it and it later has changes to this version, you will be out of sync with any changes that have been made to the package. Until approved, you should consider that this package version doesn't even exist.
  • You cannot install this package under normal scenarios. See How to install package version under moderation for more information.
  • There are also no guarantees that it will be approved.
WARNING

There are versions of this package awaiting moderation (possibly just this one). See the Version History section below.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 10 Nov 2024 14:37:30 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 Nov 2024 15:12:59 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 Nov 2024 15:34:53 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/d40168a20da2b4f67add0d896499481c for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 Nov 2024 15:53:39 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 17 Nov 2024 18:36:21 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Nov 2024 19:39:42 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the ReleaseNotes element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...
  • The DocsUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The BugTrackerUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The LicenseUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The IconUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Nov 2024 19:48:51 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/e2c940405f087d20bf35c6327d87cbf7 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 18 Nov 2024 00:23:40 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Nov 2024 01:21:07 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the ReleaseNotes element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...
  • The DocsUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The BugTrackerUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The LicenseUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The IconUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Nov 2024 01:37:36 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/24abb290e9e5ed4e2457fbfec4806622 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 18 Nov 2024 08:22:41 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Nov 2024 09:09:14 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the ReleaseNotes element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...
  • The DocsUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The BugTrackerUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The LicenseUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The IconUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Nov 2024 10:26:18 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/00b512c65c3d0591a6b0f010903c378f for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 18 Nov 2024 16:20:53 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Nov 2024 17:28:22 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the ReleaseNotes element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...
  • The DocsUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The BugTrackerUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The LicenseUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The IconUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Nov 2024 17:40:42 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/f472fe997f6c80fab069045c5d1be745 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 18 Nov 2024 18:34:56 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 18 Nov 2024 19:25:42 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Nov 2024 21:09:18 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the ReleaseNotes element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...
  • The DocsUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The BugTrackerUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The LicenseUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The IconUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Nov 2024 21:30:47 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/6905d45faefced328bc215d2b6e0c023 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 19 Nov 2024 00:21:07 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 01:29:48 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the ReleaseNotes element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...
  • The DocsUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The BugTrackerUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The LicenseUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The IconUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 01:38:40 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/2aaf09ac341dcfd93b9035d62df1db31 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 01:48:19 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 19 Nov 2024 08:23:17 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 09:23:19 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the ReleaseNotes element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...
  • The DocsUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The BugTrackerUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The LicenseUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The ProjectSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...
  • The IconUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 09:56:29 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/5b8368f80f660cd6c6bac8e021f4eb41 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 10:04:31 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 19 Nov 2024 16:23:42 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 16:57:01 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 18:08:32 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/df470c309d50d3661fd3a37ee35af40f for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2024 19:13:43 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 20 Nov 2024 00:25:30 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 01:01:43 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 02:14:24 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/b7fe0cc900ef7824d564f40e55051d06 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 06:29:10 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 20 Nov 2024 08:24:07 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 08:56:49 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 09:58:30 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/fe72d70d360d31b1981ede5a6f45da0a for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 10:07:06 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 20 Nov 2024 16:23:34 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 16:56:35 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 18:32:46 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/00c70eb9a1cc4ecfe501d22a7c473742 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2024 18:40:31 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 21 Nov 2024 00:22:01 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 00:56:57 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 01:41:39 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/a6644f7e5b884e6bd93d9440db664914 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 03:48:58 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 21 Nov 2024 08:21:28 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 08:57:26 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 09:09:58 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/b849646309d6e6fe2d5b178ab7325c1a for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 09:43:18 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 21 Nov 2024 16:25:56 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 16:59:05 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 17:06:58 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/1b9a62ad437c2b2a5872e77171c13de1 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Nov 2024 17:14:57 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 00:22:10 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 00:56:56 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 01:25:31 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/70126573bdaf8b05a884d402293a702e for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 01:35:11 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 08:22:18 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 08:55:36 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 10:01:45 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/f48fb5254f43d06a80f93cbb92f036b8 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 10:10:27 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 10:42:18 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 10:55:04 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/04f0a24d0d35bffc9146379daab8a36b for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 12:31:56 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 13:04:50 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 13:15:13 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/14e82b2755c707c51a4f4767379912dc for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 13:57:07 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 15:11:20 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 15:11:24 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 15:46:40 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 15:55:02 +00:00:

nmm has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/c3712c038b00847287316eb922ec333f for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 16:02:41 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 16:10:56 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 16:11:01 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 16:11:06 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 16:11:11 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 16:42:21 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 16:57:37 +00:00:

nmm has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/1ac8f41b9c90e1b1b058e861c4b8c836 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

tunisiano (maintainer) on 22 Nov 2024 17:23:04 +00:00:

User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 17:58:58 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • In the Description element of the nuspec file a potentially invalid Url has been found. Recommendation is to fix this URL More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 18:11:13 +00:00:

nmm has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/9c6519773bd36a2a11085c85d337ffa6 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Nov 2024 18:19:23 +00:00:

nmm has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

Description

The Nexus Mod Manager (NMM)

The Nexus Mod Manager (NMM) is a free and open source piece of software that allows you to download, install, update and manage your mod files through an easy to use interface. It integrates with the Nexus sites to provide you with a fast, efficient and much less hassled modding experience.

Features

  • 1-click download, 1-click install

    • One click on the site starts your download direct into NMM.
    • One click in the manager then installs the file into your game and activates it.
    • No faffing about with zip programs, no hassle.
  • Built in download manager

    • The mod manager comes with full download pause and resume functionality.
    • Stop your downloads and start them again later from the same place.
    • Never receive an incomplete download again.
  • Mod manager

    Enable or disable the files you would like loaded into your game through the easy to use mod management system, allowing you to try different configurations and profiles quickly and easily.

  • Clean mod installs

    Files are installed cleanly and if a mod can't finish installing for any reason the mod manager will clean up the files correctly after itself

  • Open source

    Completely free and completely open source, released under a copyleft GPL license, you can be sure that the mod manager is safe to use and free of adware, spyware and viruses

  • No advertising

    The Mod Manager is completely free of advertisements

Package-specific issue

If this package isn't up-to-date for some days, Create an issue

Support the package maintainer and Patreon


legal\LICENSE.txt
                    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
                       Version 2, June 1991

 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc., <http://fsf.org/>
 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
 Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
 of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

                            Preamble

  The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
freedom to share and change it.  By contrast, the GNU General Public
License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free
software--to make sure the software is free for all its users.  This
General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to
using it.  (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by
the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.)  You can apply it to
your programs, too.

  When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price.  Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it
if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it
in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.

  To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid
anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights.
These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you
distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.

  For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that
you have.  You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the
source code.  And you must show them these terms so they know their
rights.

  We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and
(2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy,
distribute and/or modify the software.

  Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain
that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free
software.  If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we
want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so
that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original
authors' reputations.

  Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software
patents.  We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free
program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the
program proprietary.  To prevent this, we have made it clear that any
patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.

  The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
modification follow.

                    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION

  0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains
a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed
under the terms of this General Public License.  The "Program", below,
refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program"
means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law:
that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it,
either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another
language.  (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in
the term "modification".)  Each licensee is addressed as "you".

Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not
covered by this License; they are outside its scope.  The act of
running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program
is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the
Program (independent of having been made by running the Program).
Whether that is true depends on what the Program does.

  1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's
source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you
conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate
copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the
notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty;
and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License
along with the Program.

You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and
you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee.

  2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:

    a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
    stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.

    b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
    whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
    part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
    parties under the terms of this License.

    c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively
    when run, you must cause it, when started running for such
    interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an
    announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a
    notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide
    a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under
    these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this
    License.  (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but
    does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on
    the Program is not required to print an announcement.)

These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole.  If
identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program,
and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
sections when you distribute them as separate works.  But when you
distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of
this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the
entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it.

Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest
your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to
exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or
collective works based on the Program.

In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program
with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of
a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under
the scope of this License.

  3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,
under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:

    a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable
    source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections
    1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

    b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
    years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
    cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
    machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
    distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
    customarily used for software interchange; or,

    c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer
    to distribute corresponding source code.  (This alternative is
    allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you
    received the program in object code or executable form with such
    an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.)

The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
making modifications to it.  For an executable work, complete source
code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any
associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to
control compilation and installation of the executable.  However, as a
special exception, the source code distributed need not include
anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary
form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the
operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component
itself accompanies the executable.

If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering
access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent
access to copy the source code from the same place counts as
distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not
compelled to copy the source along with the object code.

  4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program
except as expressly provided under this License.  Any attempt
otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is
void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under
this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such
parties remain in full compliance.

  5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not
signed it.  However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or
distribute the Program or its derivative works.  These actions are
prohibited by law if you do not accept this License.  Therefore, by
modifying or distributing the Program (or any work based on the
Program), you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so, and
all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying
the Program or works based on it.

  6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
these terms and conditions.  You may not impose any further
restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein.
You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to
this License.

  7. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent
infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues),
conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or
otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not
excuse you from the conditions of this License.  If you cannot
distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this
License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you
may not distribute the Program at all.  For example, if a patent
license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by
all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then
the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to
refrain entirely from distribution of the Program.

If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under
any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to
apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other
circumstances.

It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any
patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any
such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the
integrity of the free software distribution system, which is
implemented by public license practices.  Many people have made
generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed
through that system in reliance on consistent application of that
system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing
to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot
impose that choice.

This section is intended to make thoroughly clear what is believed to
be a consequence of the rest of this License.

  8. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in
certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the
original copyright holder who places the Program under this License
may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding
those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among
countries not thus excluded.  In such case, this License incorporates
the limitation as if written in the body of this License.

  9. The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions
of the General Public License from time to time.  Such new versions will
be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to
address new problems or concerns.

Each version is given a distinguishing version number.  If the Program
specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any
later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions
either of that version or of any later version published by the Free
Software Foundation.  If the Program does not specify a version number of
this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software
Foundation.

  10. If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free
programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author
to ask for permission.  For software which is copyrighted by the Free
Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes
make exceptions for this.  Our decision will be guided by the two goals
of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and
of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally.

                            NO WARRANTY

  11. BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY
FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW.  EXCEPT WHEN
OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES
PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  THE ENTIRE RISK AS
TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU.  SHOULD THE
PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING,
REPAIR OR CORRECTION.

  12. IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING
WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR
REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES,
INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING
OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY
YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER
PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

                     END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS

            How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs

  If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest
possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms.

  To do so, attach the following notices to the program.  It is safest
to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively
convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least
the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.

    {description}
    Copyright (C) {year}  {fullname}

    This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
    it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
    the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
    (at your option) any later version.

    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
    GNU General Public License for more details.

    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
    with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
    51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.

Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.

If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice like this
when it starts in an interactive mode:

    Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) year name of author
    Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
    This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
    under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.

The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate
parts of the General Public License.  Of course, the commands you use may
be called something other than `show w' and `show c'; they could even be
mouse-clicks or menu items--whatever suits your program.

You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your
school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if
necessary.  Here is a sample; alter the names:

  Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright interest in the program
  `Gnomovision' (which makes passes at compilers) written by James Hacker.

  {signature of Ty Coon}, 1 April 1989
  Ty Coon, President of Vice

This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into
proprietary programs.  If your program is a subroutine library, you may
consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the
library.  If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General
Public License instead of this License.

legal\VERIFICATION.txt
VERIFICATION

Verification is intended to assist the Chocolatey moderators and community
in verifying that this package's contents are trustworthy.

The embedded software has been downloaded from the listed download
location on <https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/Nexus-Mod-Manager/releases/tag/0.87.1>
and can be verified by doing the following:

1. Download the following:

  url: <https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/Nexus-Mod-Manager/releases/download/0.87.1/NMM-0.87.1.exe>

  2. You can obtain the checksum using one of the following methods:
    - Use powershell function 'Get-FileHash'
    - Use Chocolatey utility 'checksum.exe'

  checksum type: sha256
  checksum:322224E3FE6A6D84D5190D10980551CDC7E8D4DBB826D43EA696E80EC57BAB10

Using AU:

  Get-RemoteChecksum

The file 'license.txt' is obtained from:
  <https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/Nexus-Mod-Manager/blob/master/LICENSE>
tools\.skipAutoUninstall
 
tools\chocolateyInstall.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'

$packageName = 'nmm'

$toolsDir = Split-Path $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition
$fileLocation = Get-Item "$toolsDir\*.exe"

$packageArgs = @{
  packageName    = $packageName
  fileType       = 'exe'
  file           = $fileLocation
  silentArgs     = "/VERYSILENT /SUPPRESSMSGBOXES /NORESTART /SP- /LOG=`"$($env:TEMP)\$($env:chocolateyPackageName).$($env:chocolateyPackageVersion).InnoInstall.log`""
  validExitCodes = @(0)
}

Install-ChocolateyInstallPackage @packageArgs

# Remove the installers as there is no more need for it
Remove-Item $toolsDir\*.exe -ea 0 -Force
tools\chocolateyUninstall.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'

$packageName = 'nmm'
$programUninstallEntryName = 'Nexus Mod Manager*'

$toolsDir = Split-Path $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition
$registry = Get-UninstallRegistryKey -SoftwareName $programUninstallEntryName
$file = $registry.UninstallString -replace ('/SILENT', '')

$packageArgs = @{
  packageName    = $packageName
  fileType       = 'exe'
  silentArgs     = '/VERYSILENT /SUPPRESSMSGBOXES /NORESTART /SP-'
  validExitCodes = @(0)
  file           = $file
}

Start-Process 'AutoHotkey' "$toolsDir\uninstall.ahk"
Uninstall-ChocolateyPackage @packageArgs
tools\NMM-0.87.1.exe
md5: C985B9D205232F5FD00E4F9DE705ED75 | sha1: C559C258E4CE8447067D4F18DD417EA12D19E7F2 | sha256: 322224E3FE6A6D84D5190D10980551CDC7E8D4DBB826D43EA696E80EC57BAB10 | sha512: AF8B629F36B2F42D864A7839928798FFE88B9591A5F24FCDAA4D6CCC3D3947369FD376ACE017F644AE559C57E6E452AEEE4B672FEAC74361620B7015970FEA1B
tools\uninstall.ahk
#NoEnv  ; Recommended for performance and compatibility with future AutoHotkey releases.
; #Warn  ; Enable warnings to assist with detecting common errors.
SendMode Input  ; Recommended for new scripts due to its superior speed and reliability.
SetWorkingDir %A_ScriptDir%  ; Ensures a consistent starting directory.

; variables
Winahk = Uninstall

WinWait, %Winahk%, &Yes
ControlClick, &Yes, %Winahk%

ExitApp

Log in or click on link to see number of positives.

In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).

Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.

Add to Builder Version Downloads Last Updated Status
Nexus Mod Manager 0.87.1 74 Friday, November 22, 2024 Ready
Nexus Mod Manager 0.86.1 135 Wednesday, May 29, 2024 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.86.0 221 Monday, January 8, 2024 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.85.0 230 Tuesday, October 31, 2023 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.9 237 Sunday, August 13, 2023 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.8 318 Monday, May 8, 2023 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.7 67 Monday, May 8, 2023 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.6 130 Sunday, May 7, 2023 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.5 162 Monday, April 17, 2023 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.4 198 Saturday, March 4, 2023 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.3 211 Tuesday, December 6, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.2 58 Monday, December 5, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.1 187 Monday, November 7, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.84.0 69 Sunday, November 6, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.9 149 Wednesday, September 28, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.8 77 Monday, September 26, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.7 87 Friday, September 23, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.6 233 Monday, May 23, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.5 238 Thursday, February 17, 2022 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.4 228 Monday, December 27, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.3 215 Sunday, November 14, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.2 145 Thursday, November 4, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.1 148 Saturday, October 30, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.83.0 79 Saturday, October 30, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.82.1 114 Monday, October 25, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.82.0 109 Sunday, October 24, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.81.1 210 Tuesday, September 7, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.81.0 152 Thursday, September 2, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.14 264 Monday, May 31, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.13 164 Wednesday, May 19, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.12 151 Sunday, May 9, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.10 192 Monday, April 19, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.9 159 Sunday, April 18, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.8 154 Sunday, April 11, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.7 136 Wednesday, April 7, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.6 100 Tuesday, April 6, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.5 112 Tuesday, April 6, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.4 111 Wednesday, March 31, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.3 115 Wednesday, March 31, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.2 160 Sunday, March 21, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.1 150 Sunday, March 14, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.80.0 151 Monday, March 1, 2021 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.72.3 385 Friday, October 23, 2020 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.72.2 256 Thursday, September 17, 2020 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.72.1 238 Wednesday, July 8, 2020 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.70.7 382 Sunday, May 19, 2019 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.70.6 195 Friday, May 17, 2019 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.70.5 325 Thursday, May 16, 2019 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.70.4 236 Wednesday, May 15, 2019 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.70.3 220 Tuesday, May 14, 2019 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.70.1 211 Monday, May 13, 2019 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.70.0 221 Monday, May 13, 2019 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.65.11 302 Friday, March 29, 2019 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.64.3 845 Tuesday, March 13, 2018 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.64.2 650 Friday, March 2, 2018 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.64.1 376 Tuesday, February 20, 2018 Approved
Nexus Mod Manager 0.63.19 450 Saturday, February 3, 2018 Approved
Discussion for the Nexus Mod Manager Package

Ground Rules:

  • This discussion is only about Nexus Mod Manager and the Nexus Mod Manager package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
  • This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
  • The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
  • Tell us what you love about the package or Nexus Mod Manager, or tell us what needs improvement.
  • Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
  • If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
comments powered by Disqus