Downloads:
229
Downloads of v 1.3.0:
24
Last Update:
05 May 2025
Published Date:
05 May 2025
Reviewed Date:
03 May 2025
Reviewer:
Package Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- TeamEXtension
Tags:
update dependency version- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Software License
- Software Docs
- Software Issues
- Package Specific:
- Package Source
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
UpdateDep
(Maintainer responded, waiting for review/Maintainer update)
- 1
- 2
- 3
1.3.0 | Updated: 05 May 2025
- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Software License
- Software Docs
- Software Issues
- Package Specific:
- Package Source
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
Downloads:
229
Downloads of v 1.3.0:
24
Published:
05 May 2025
Reviewed:
03 May 2025
Reviewer:
Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- TeamEXtension
UpdateDep 1.3.0
(Maintainer responded, waiting for review/Maintainer update)
Legal Disclaimer: Neither this package nor Chocolatey Software, Inc. are affiliated with or endorsed by TeamEXtension. The inclusion of TeamEXtension trademark(s), if any, upon this webpage is solely to identify TeamEXtension goods or services and not for commercial purposes.
- 1
- 2
- 3
All Checks are Passing
3 Passing Tests
This version is in moderation and has not yet been approved. This means it doesn't show up under normal search.
- Until approved, you should consider this package version unsafe - it could do very bad things to your system (it probably doesn't but you have been warned, that's why we have moderation).
- This package version can change wildly over the course of moderation until it is approved. If you install it and it later has changes to this version, you will be out of sync with any changes that have been made to the package. Until approved, you should consider that this package version doesn't even exist.
- You cannot install this package under normal scenarios. See How to install package version under moderation for more information.
- There are also no guarantees that it will be approved.
There are versions of this package awaiting moderation (possibly just this one). See the Version History section below.
Uses pom.xml or build.gradle in the current directory if not specified. Processing time depends on build time and number of dependencies. Automated breaking change detection depends on project test coverage. Projects with minimal test coverage will have to be manually tested for breaking changes.
$packageName = 'updatedep'
$installDir = Join-Path $env:ProgramFiles $packageName
# Remove the JAR file and other related files
if (Test-Path $installDir) {
Remove-Item -Path $installDir -Recurse -Force
}
# Optionally remove the directory from PATH
$env:Path = $env:Path -replace [regex]::Escape(";$installDir"), ""
[System.Environment]::SetEnvironmentVariable("Path", $env:Path, [System.EnvironmentVariableTarget]::Machine)
alpha
b
dev
m
pre
rc
snapshot
From: https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
LICENSE
Apache License
Version 2.0, January 2004
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
1. Definitions.
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by the copyright owner that is granting the License.
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity exercising permissions granted by this License.
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, including but not limited to software source code, documentation source, and configuration files.
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical transformation or translation of a Source form, including but not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, and conversions to other media types.
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work (an example is provided in the Appendix below).
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted" means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and subsequently incorporated within the Work.
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed.
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions:
You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files; and
You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and
If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License.
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License.
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of this License, without any additional terms or conditions. Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
VERIFICATION
Verification is intended to assist the Chocolatey moderators and community
in verifying that this package's contents are trustworthy.
How to verify checksum contents
Windows
# Open this link your browser https://github.com/teamextension/updatedep/releases/download/1.3.0/updatedep.jar
# An updatedep.jar file will be downloaded
# Open a command line
# Change directory to the folder of the downloaded updatedep.jar file
# execute: certutil -hashfile .\updatedep.jar SHA256
# the value should match with "081b7458c989bcc1f377989f40293fafb4d02b56cf077503835abe705dcd9bf5"
# Open this link your browser https://github.com/teamextension/updatedep/releases/download/1.3.0/exclude.txt
# An exclude.txt file will be downloaded
# Open a command line
# Change directory to the folder of the downloaded exclude.txt file
# execute: certutil -hashfile .\exclude.txt SHA256
# the value should match with "fcf67c8848697f25a6ada9984aff5a43a9e10cc36ed2daf1a7392b2d24b44c71"
Mac OS
# Open this link your browser https://github.com/teamextension/updatedep/releases/download/1.3.0/updatedep.jar
# An updatedep.jar file will be downloaded
# Open terminal
# Change directory to the folder of the downloaded updatedep.jar file
# execute: shasum -a 256 updatedep.jar
# the value should match with "081b7458c989bcc1f377989f40293fafb4d02b56cf077503835abe705dcd9bf5"
# Open this link your browser https://github.com/teamextension/updatedep/releases/download/1.3.0/exclude.txt
# An exclude.txt file will be downloaded
# Open terminal
# Change directory to the folder of the downloaded exclude.txt file
# execute: shasum -a 256 exclude.txt
# the value should match with "fcf67c8848697f25a6ada9984aff5a43a9e10cc36ed2daf1a7392b2d24b44c71"
Log in or click on link to see number of positives.
- UpdateDep.1.3.0.nupkg (b9ddd9011ed0) - ## / 43
In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).
Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.
Add to Builder | Version | Downloads | Last Updated | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
UpdateDep 1.3.0 | 24 | Monday, May 5, 2025 |
Responded
|
|
UpdateDep 1.2.0 | 73 | Thursday, February 13, 2025 | Approved | |
UpdateDep 1.1.0 | 65 | Tuesday, September 3, 2024 | Approved | |
UpdateDep 1.0.0 | 67 | Friday, June 7, 2024 | Approved |
Ground Rules:
- This discussion is only about UpdateDep and the UpdateDep package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
- This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
- The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
- Tell us what you love about the package or UpdateDep, or tell us what needs improvement.
- Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
- If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
japbautista96 (maintainer) on 16 Apr 2025 21:36:10 +00:00:
User 'japbautista96' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 16 Apr 2025 22:11:50 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Apr 2025 09:26:52 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/0a190a96412ec4809ee4220bd5cfb521 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Apr 2025 09:48:41 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated virus scanning.
Pauby (reviewer) on 17 Apr 2025 19:08:01 +00:00:
Hi, a couple of issues / suggestions / questions:
id
to lower case.owners
field is your Chocolatey username.docsUrl
,mailingListUrl
,bugTrackerUrl
andpackageSourceUrl
fields to the nuspec file if you haven't already?licenseUrl
to your .nuspec file and ensxure it is the same URL at the top of your LICENSE.txt file.updatedep.jar
file can be downloaded and verified from the official source.$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
is the first line in your Chocolatey package PowerShell scripts.Install-ChocolateyPath
rather than manipulating the path in lilnes 35 to 42 of yourchocolateyInstall.ps1
.Thanks.
Paul
japbautista96 (maintainer) on 22 Apr 2025 20:33:46 +00:00:
User 'japbautista96' (maintainer) submitted package.
japbautista96 (maintainer) on 22 Apr 2025 20:35:12 +00:00:
User 'japbautista96' (maintainer) submitted package.
japbautista96 (maintainer) on 22 Apr 2025 20:37:31 +00:00:
Hi Reviewer Team,
Good day.
We have done following the suggestions aside for mailingListUrl as we have not supported this currently. Can we request to proceed without it?
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Apr 2025 21:06:28 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Apr 2025 21:25:11 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/a340eaa53c7edfcb9be55631a5090f9f for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 22 Apr 2025 21:38:30 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated virus scanning.
flcdrg (reviewer) on 25 Apr 2025 02:39:26 +00:00:
Please resolve these to allow this package to be approved:
tools\VERIFICATION.txt
should contain instructions on how the user can independently verify that the embedded file is the same as available for download from the original site.thanks,
David
japbautista96 (maintainer) on 29 Apr 2025 16:30:47 +00:00:
User 'japbautista96' (maintainer) submitted package.
japbautista96 (maintainer) on 29 Apr 2025 16:32:19 +00:00:
Hi Reviewer Team,
Good day.
We have updated the tools\VERIFICATION.txt. Please help approve our package.
Thanks,
Jesli
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 29 Apr 2025 17:06:01 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 29 Apr 2025 18:29:47 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/23ea92441f1f7a83982141174aabff87 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 29 Apr 2025 18:50:18 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated virus scanning.
flcdrg (reviewer) on 03 May 2025 04:10:19 +00:00:
Repeating request - please read it carefully:
tools\VERIFICATION.txt
should contain instructions on how the user can independently verify that the embedded file is the same as available for download from the original site.So don't give instructions on how to get checksums of the files that are included in the package. Chocolatey already lists those automatically on the package's webpage. Instead you should describe how to get the files from the original website and calculate checksums on those - then they can be compared by the end user against the ones listed on the Chocolatey package web page to confirm that the files are identical and haven't been modified or tampered with.
David
japbautista96 (maintainer) on 05 May 2025 19:05:35 +00:00:
User 'japbautista96' (maintainer) submitted package.
japbautista96 (maintainer) on 05 May 2025 19:07:28 +00:00:
Hi Review Team,
These are noted. Thank you for this clarification.
Done updating the tools\VERIFICATION.txt. Please help approve our package.
Thanks,
Jesli
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 05 May 2025 19:38:46 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 05 May 2025 20:01:44 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/fb7dc8cb91a021d52bc278e981c95d4d for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 05 May 2025 20:19:53 +00:00:
UpdateDep has passed automated virus scanning.