Unpacking Software Livestream

Join our monthly Unpacking Software livestream to hear about the latest news, chat and opinion on packaging, software deployment and lifecycle management!

Learn More

Chocolatey Product Spotlight

Join the Chocolatey Team on our regular monthly stream where we put a spotlight on the most recent Chocolatey product releases. You'll have a chance to have your questions answered in a live Ask Me Anything format.

Learn More

Chocolatey Coding Livestream

Join us for the Chocolatey Coding Livestream, where members of our team dive into the heart of open source development by coding live on various Chocolatey projects. Tune in to witness real-time coding, ask questions, and gain insights into the world of package management. Don't miss this opportunity to engage with our team and contribute to the future of Chocolatey!

Learn More

Calling All Chocolatiers! Whipping Up Windows Automation with Chocolatey Central Management

Webinar from
Wednesday, 17 January 2024

We are delighted to announce the release of Chocolatey Central Management v0.12.0, featuring seamless Deployment Plan creation, time-saving duplications, insightful Group Details, an upgraded Dashboard, bug fixes, user interface polishing, and refined documentation. As an added bonus we'll have members of our Solutions Engineering team on-hand to dive into some interesting ways you can leverage the new features available!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey Community Coffee Break

Join the Chocolatey Team as we discuss all things Community, what we do, how you can get involved and answer your Chocolatey questions.

Watch The Replays
Chocolatey and Intune Overview

Webinar Replay from
Wednesday, 30 March 2022

At Chocolatey Software we strive for simple, and teaching others. Let us teach you just how simple it could be to keep your 3rd party applications updated across your devices, all with Intune!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey For Business. In Azure. In One Click.

Livestream from
Thursday, 9 June 2022

Join James and Josh to show you how you can get the Chocolatey For Business recommended infrastructure and workflow, created, in Azure, in around 20 minutes.

Watch On-Demand
The Future of Chocolatey CLI

Livestream from
Thursday, 04 August 2022

Join Paul and Gary to hear more about the plans for the Chocolatey CLI in the not so distant future. We'll talk about some cool new features, long term asks from Customers and Community and how you can get involved!

Watch On-Demand
Hacktoberfest Tuesdays 2022

Livestreams from
October 2022

For Hacktoberfest, Chocolatey ran a livestream every Tuesday! Re-watch Cory, James, Gary, and Rain as they share knowledge on how to contribute to open-source projects such as Chocolatey CLI.

Watch On-Demand

Downloads:

113

Downloads of v 1.18.6:

98

Last Update:

04 Jun 2025

Published Date:

04 Jun 2025

Reviewed Date:

06 May 2025

Reviewer:

gravatar

Package Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • Zenarmor

Tags:

zenarmor sase sse ngfw network security

Zenarmor

(Maintainer responded, waiting for review/Maintainer update)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

1.18.6 | Updated: 04 Jun 2025

Downloads:

113

Downloads of v 1.18.6:

98

Published:

04 Jun 2025

Reviewed:

06 May 2025

Reviewer:

gravatar

Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • Zenarmor

Zenarmor 1.18.6

(Maintainer responded, waiting for review/Maintainer update)

Legal Disclaimer: Neither this package nor Chocolatey Software, Inc. are affiliated with or endorsed by Zenarmor. The inclusion of Zenarmor trademark(s), if any, upon this webpage is solely to identify Zenarmor goods or services and not for commercial purposes.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This Package Contains an Exempted Check

Not All Tests Have Passed


Validation Testing Passed


Verification Testing Exemption:

Updates network stack which is incompatible with test environment

Details

Scan Testing Successful:

No detections found in any package files

Details
IMPORTANT

This version is in moderation and has not yet been approved. This means it doesn't show up under normal search.

  • Until approved, you should consider this package version unsafe - it could do very bad things to your system (it probably doesn't but you have been warned, that's why we have moderation).
  • This package version can change wildly over the course of moderation until it is approved. If you install it and it later has changes to this version, you will be out of sync with any changes that have been made to the package. Until approved, you should consider that this package version doesn't even exist.
  • You cannot install this package under normal scenarios. See How to install package version under moderation for more information.
  • There are also no guarantees that it will be approved.
WARNING

There are versions of this package awaiting moderation (possibly just this one). See the Version History section below.

pymete (maintainer) on 06 Mar 2025 05:13:49 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 06 Mar 2025 05:48:25 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 06 Mar 2025 16:48:52 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/41222d25aab6eebaf97a1b62929b3f22 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 06 Mar 2025 19:13:58 +00:00:

I successfully installed Zenarmor using this command.

choco install zenarmor --version=1.18.6

Regarding the verification failed, there is no problem in the log you provided.

https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/41222d25aab6eebaf97a1b62929b3f22

Can I get support on why it failed?

pymete (maintainer) on 08 Mar 2025 04:42:29 +00:00:

Updated remote MSI package.
Verification Status Change - Verification tests have been set to rerun.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 04:53:10 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/87804b4541d0f7a8a046db6761725ca7 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 08 Mar 2025 05:20:13 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 05:54:53 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 06:01:00 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/ad12ecf1f906ce99ce05d2e6b4dd8314 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 06:18:45 +00:00:

Zenarmor has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

pymete (maintainer) on 08 Mar 2025 06:33:38 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 07:06:34 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 08:08:41 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/970a842956129288138521aa3d3a34ba for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 08 Mar 2025 19:39:47 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 20:15:29 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 21:20:23 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/c8ba1fe31f25a69b58a226d608422c42 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2025 21:23:37 +00:00:

Zenarmor has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

pymete (maintainer) on 09 Mar 2025 05:35:15 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 09 Mar 2025 06:07:44 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 09 Mar 2025 07:47:06 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/cf75cce32515fdb7c1cc60b6200a54d0 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 09 Mar 2025 13:52:21 +00:00:

The installation is not supposed to be timeout.
Verification Status Change - Verification tests have been set to rerun.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 09 Mar 2025 14:43:19 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/1148236f1bfd387dcb7d66cfb182bcf8 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 09 Mar 2025 14:55:20 +00:00:

Zenarmor has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 1 and 5 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This is not enough detections to prevent the approval of this package version.

pymete (maintainer) on 14 Mar 2025 04:01:28 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

pymete (maintainer) on 14 Mar 2025 04:02:14 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

pymete (maintainer) on 14 Mar 2025 04:02:38 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 14 Mar 2025 04:35:47 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

pymete (maintainer) on 14 Mar 2025 04:37:09 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 14 Mar 2025 05:09:39 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 14 Mar 2025 11:46:49 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/040206e49f634380a833c62dc9b79ce3 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 14 Mar 2025 11:52:53 +00:00:

Unexpected installation timeout.
Verification Status Change - Verification tests have been set to rerun.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 14 Mar 2025 13:20:37 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/57d8c82a112291baf71b725fc6fd2777 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 14 Mar 2025 13:38:18 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated virus scanning.

pymete (maintainer) on 16 Mar 2025 21:10:16 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

pymete (maintainer) on 16 Mar 2025 21:36:15 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

pymete (maintainer) on 16 Mar 2025 21:58:05 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 16 Mar 2025 22:31:27 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

pymete (maintainer) on 16 Mar 2025 22:34:37 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 16 Mar 2025 23:06:42 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 16 Mar 2025 23:57:31 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/88fb4a0cd86ebb052b1ada7ccd5b1d2d for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 17 Mar 2025 03:11:28 +00:00:

The installation completes successfully without waiting for any input from the user and without showing a popup window. It should not fail in this way.

pymete (maintainer) on 17 Mar 2025 05:25:16 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

pymete (maintainer) on 17 Mar 2025 05:51:58 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Mar 2025 06:26:50 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Mar 2025 07:30:00 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/db82dac49f4920ada2a9245cfe948e87 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 17 Mar 2025 11:20:01 +00:00:

Unexpected installation timeout.
Verification Status Change - Verification tests have been set to rerun.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Mar 2025 13:02:06 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/769cbd57cfb4b4cc78e45cdaecd46ab4 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 17 Mar 2025 13:25:38 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Mar 2025 14:01:09 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Mar 2025 15:04:35 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/9e3beb2747e780de084081c8b6c1e230 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 17 Mar 2025 19:16:25 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Mar 2025 19:51:31 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...
  • notSilent tag is being used. The reviewer will ensure this is being used appropriately. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Mar 2025 21:30:15 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/c148417e22a216ecc263d9e4c7621dcf for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 17 Mar 2025 21:37:18 +00:00:

During the package installation, a network-based driver installation is included. This driver can only be installed with the netcfg command, which does not pass the “Verification Test” because it shows a window for a few milliseconds. Since this driver cannot be installed and integrated in any other way, it needs to be given an exception.

pymete (maintainer) on 24 Mar 2025 11:26:59 +00:00:

Unexpected installation timeout.
Verification Status Change - Verification tests have been set to rerun.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 24 Mar 2025 13:03:21 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/601b785fc6957b00fa390cf586f5ae5b for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 24 Mar 2025 21:13:28 +00:00:

During the package installation, a network-based driver installation is included. This driver can only be installed with the netcfg command, which does not pass the “Verification Test” because it shows a window for a few milliseconds. Since this driver cannot be installed and integrated in any other way, it needs to be given an exception.

gep13 (reviewer) on 25 Mar 2025 10:37:02 +00:00:

Showing a screen during the installation of a package is not an immediate failure for a package. As long as the screen is dismissed automatically, and doesn't require any user interaction, then that is fine.

Can you confirm if you have tested the package installation using the local Chocolatey Test Environment, as suggested in the email that you would have received when the package failed.

pymete (maintainer) on 25 Mar 2025 12:50:09 +00:00:

Yes, I installed the “Chocolatey Test Environment” and did my tests. During the test there, the VM was freezing at some point and I couldn't figure out why. I will try to test it again.

Could it be the following problem: during the installation of the driver, the network goes down for a very short time and comes back up again.

gep13 (reviewer) on 26 Mar 2025 07:39:54 +00:00:

The short answer, I am not sure.

I will say, if there is an issue on the Chocolatey Test Environment, you are more than likely to see the same issue on the package-verifier. Once the installation is smoothly running on the Test Environment, chances are high that it will work on package-verifier.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 15 Apr 2025 07:42:59 +00:00:

We've found Zenarmor v1.18.6 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.

Take action:

  • Log in to the site and respond to the review comments.
  • Resubmit fixes for this version.
  • If the package version is failing automated checks, you can self-reject the package.

If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.

Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.

pymete (maintainer) on 18 Apr 2025 12:17:19 +00:00:

After starting the test with the "vagrant provision" command, many windows open and close within the virtual machine, and eventually, a blank screen remains, making it seem like the test has completed:
Screenshot

But the "vagrant provision" command doesn't finish; it keeps waiting on this line for a long time:

    default: Running Install-ChocolateyInstallPackage -packageName 'Zenarmor' -fileType 'MSI' -silentArgs '/qn /norestart /l*v "C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor.1.18.6.MsiInstall.log"' -file 'C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor\1.18.6\Zenarmor_1.18.6_x64_en-US.msi' -validExitCodes '0 3010 1641' -useOnlyPackageSilentArguments 'False'
    default: Running Get-OSArchitectureWidth -compare '32'
    default: Installing Zenarmor...
    default: Ensuring 'C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey' exists
    default: Running Start-ChocolateyProcessAsAdmin -validExitCodes '0 3010 1641' -workingDirectory 'C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor\1.18.6' -statements '/i "C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor\1.18.6\Zenarmor_1.18.6_x64_en-US.msi" /qn /norestart /l*v "C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor.1.18.6.MsiInstall.log"' -exeToRun 'C:\Windows\System32\msiexec.exe'
    default: Running Test-ProcessAdminRights
    default: Test-ProcessAdminRights: returning True
    default: Finishing 'Test-ProcessAdminRights'
    default: Elevating permissions and running ["C:\Windows\System32\msiexec.exe" /i "C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor\1.18.6\Zenarmor_1.18.6_x64_en-US.msi" /qn /norestart /l*v "C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor.1.18.6.MsiInstall.log"]. This may take a while, depending on the statements.

According to the msi log, the installation appears to have completed successfully:

MSI (s) (B8:E4) [11:54:02:005]: Product: Zenarmor -- Installation completed successfully.

MSI (s) (B8:E4) [11:54:02:005]: Windows Installer installed the product. Product Name: Zenarmor. Product Version: 1.18.6. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Sunny Valley Cyber Security Inc.. Installation success or error status: 0.

MSI (s) (B8:E4) [11:54:02:022]: Deferring clean up of packages/files, if any exist
MSI (s) (B8:E4) [11:54:02:022]: MainEngineThread is returning 0
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:022]: RESTART MANAGER: Session closed.
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:022]: No System Restore sequence number for this installation.
=== Logging stopped: 4/18/2025  11:54:02 ===
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:051]: User policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:051]: Machine policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:051]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:051]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2 
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:051]: Note: 1: 2265 2:  3: -2147287035 
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:051]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2 
MSI (s) (B8:34) [11:54:02:051]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied.  Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (34:80) [11:54:02:051]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied.  Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (34:80) [11:54:02:051]: MainEngineThread is returning 0
=== Verbose logging stopped: 4/18/2025  11:54:02 ===

In fact, I can launch and comfortably use my application on the virtual machine:
![Screenshot]https://i.ibb.co/9H86xYxg/Screenshot-2025-04-18-150530.png)

During the msi installation, the netcfg command, used to install the driver, temporarily disables the network interface before bringing it back up. It seems this is disrupting the test process.

Would it be possible to make an exception for this behavior?

pymete (maintainer) on 18 Apr 2025 12:21:36 +00:00:

After waiting for a long time, the "vagrant provision" command resulted in the following output:

    default: Elevating permissions and running ["C:\Windows\System32\msiexec.exe" /i "C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor\1.18.6\Zenarmor_1.18.6_x64_en-US.msi" /qn /norestart /l*v "C:\Users\vagrant\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\zenarmor.1.18.6.MsiInstall.log"]. This may take a while, depending on the statements.
Vagrant timed out while attempting to connect via WinRM. This usually
means that the VM booted, but there are issues with the WinRM configuration
or network connectivity issues. Please try to `vagrant reload` or
`vagrant up` again.

This also strengthens the possibility that the issue was caused by the network temporarily going down during the driver installation with netcfg.

Pauby (reviewer) on 18 Apr 2025 20:50:01 +00:00:

I have tested this locally in the Chocolatey Test Environment and it installs without issue. Note I'm not using Vagrant to communicate with the virtual machine. I won't add an exemption at this time as I would like to see what happens at the next version. If it continues to fail we can then look at it.
Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'exempted'.

Pauby (reviewer) on 18 Apr 2025 20:52:51 +00:00:

I'm actually moving this back to the Submitted state as the Uninstall for the package is broken. I get an empty white box, titled Zenarmor that just sits there forever.
Status Change - Changed status of package from 'exempted' to 'submitted'.

pymete (maintainer) on 19 Apr 2025 17:37:21 +00:00:

Yes, you're right — we were aware of this issue and fixed it in the new version. However, I didn’t want to submit a new request before the approval process for version 1.18.6 was completed.
I’ll apply this fix to version 1.18.6 as well and submit the new package for approval.

pymete (maintainer) on 29 Apr 2025 08:36:43 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

pymete (maintainer) on 29 Apr 2025 08:57:45 +00:00:

The issue experienced with the uninstall process showing a white box has now been resolved. You should no longer encounter this problem with the new 1.18.6 package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 29 Apr 2025 09:12:14 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...
  • notSilent tag is being used. The reviewer will ensure this is being used appropriately. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 29 Apr 2025 11:11:27 +00:00:

Zenarmor has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/4c375eaa73d3280166aec165a45946a3 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

pymete (maintainer) on 29 Apr 2025 14:30:11 +00:00:

For the same reason, it seems that the installation timed out and failed because the network temporarily went down and then came back up during driver installation via the netcfg command — but in reality, there's no actual issue with the installation itself.

I'm experiencing the same issue in the test environment I set up with Vagrant. Since the network gets reset during the installation, the result of the msiexec command cannot be retrieved.

As the previous reviewer did, if tested locally, it will be clear that there is no issue with the installation.

flcdrg (reviewer) on 03 May 2025 04:07:10 +00:00:

Add exemption

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 03 May 2025 05:00:28 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated virus scanning.

Pauby (reviewer) on 06 May 2025 22:31:45 +00:00:

The uninstall still isn't silent. There is a pop-up that asks if I want to uninstall Microsoft Edge WebView2 Runtime.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 26 May 2025 22:32:17 +00:00:

We've found Zenarmor v1.18.6 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.

Take action:

  • Log in to the site and respond to the review comments.
  • Resubmit fixes for this version.
  • If the package version is failing automated checks, you can self-reject the package.

If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.

Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.

pymete (maintainer) on 04 Jun 2025 08:27:02 +00:00:

User 'pymete' (maintainer) submitted package.

pymete (maintainer) on 04 Jun 2025 08:35:13 +00:00:

The pop-up related to the uninstallation of "Microsoft Edge WebView2 Runtime" is shown by Chocolatey's "Auto Uninstaller". During the initial installation of Zenarmor, if "Edge WebView" is not already installed on the system, it gets installed. However, during uninstallation, Microsoft Windows does not allow "Edge WebView" to be removed. For this reason, I have disabled Chocolatey’s auto uninstaller.

Additionally, during installation, the netcfg command causes the network to go down briefly and then come back up, which can still lead to test failures. It would be good to keep this in mind as well.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 04 Jun 2025 09:02:59 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 04 Jun 2025 09:23:21 +00:00:

Zenarmor has passed automated virus scanning.

Description

Zenarmor technology is a hardware-agnostic network security platform capable of running natively on multiple platforms, including BSD, Linux, Windows, MacOS, pfSense and OPNsense, affording you the freedom of deploying enterprise-grade network security where you need it the most while remaining in full control of your infrastructure and privacy.

Features and Capabilities Include:

  • Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
  • Full Mesh Business VPN with micro-segmentation
  • Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) - Granular Cloud Application Control
  • Secure Web Gateway (Application and Web Traffic Control)
  • All-Ports Full TLS Inspection
  • Advanced Network Analytics and Integrated Threat Intelligence
  • Identity and Access Management & Single Sign-on (SSO)
  • A Multi-Tenant capable management dashboard

Installation

Installation without parameters.

 choco install zenarmor

Installation with parameter.

 choco install zenarmor --params="'/Organization:my-org'"

By specifying the Organization parameter, after the application is opened, the signin process can be started directly without entering the organization domain.


tools\.skipAutoUninstall
 
tools\chocolateyinstall.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"

$PackageParameters = Get-PackageParameters

$packageArgs = @{
  packageName   = "Zenarmor"
  softwareName  = "Zenarmor"
  fileType      = "MSI"
  
  url           = "https://updates.zenarmor.com/desktop/Zenarmor_1.18.6_x64_en-US.msi"
  checksum      = "a46468599a164c680028ee6fd4e8d4a25f21e8a55cf1344127a5b4ac33704916"
  checksumType  = "sha256"

  silentArgs    = "/qn /norestart"
  validExitCodes= @(0, 3010, 1641)
}

Install-ChocolateyPackage @packageArgs

if ($PackageParameters['Organization']) {
  Get-ChildItem -Path "C:\Users" -Directory | ForEach-Object {
    $roamingPath = "$($_.FullName)\AppData\Roaming"
    if (Test-Path $roamingPath) {
        $organizationInferFile = "$roamingPath\zenarmor-organization.txt"
        $PackageParameters['Organization'] | Set-Content -Path $organizationInferFile -Force
    }
  }
}
tools\chocolateyuninstall.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"

$packageArgs = @{
  packageName   = "Zenarmor"
  softwareName  = "Zenarmor"
  fileType      = "MSI"

  silentArgs    = "/qn /norestart"
  validExitCodes= @(0, 3010, 1605, 1614, 1641)
}

[array]$key = Get-UninstallRegistryKey -SoftwareName $packageArgs["softwareName"]

if ($key.Count -eq 1) {
  $key | % {
    $packageArgs["file"] = "$($_.UninstallString)"
    if ($packageArgs["fileType"] -eq "MSI") {
      $packageArgs["silentArgs"] = "$($_.PSChildName) $($packageArgs["silentArgs"])"
      $packageArgs["file"] = ""
    }
    Uninstall-ChocolateyPackage @packageArgs
  }
} elseif ($key.Count -eq 0) {
  Write-Warning "$packageName has already been uninstalled by other means."
} elseif ($key.Count -gt 1) {
  Write-Warning "$($key.Count) matches found!"
  Write-Warning "To prevent accidental data loss, no programs will be uninstalled."
  Write-Warning "Please alert package maintainer the following keys were matched:"
  $key | % {Write-Warning "- $($_.DisplayName)"}
}

Log in or click on link to see number of positives.

In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).

Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.

Add to Builder Version Downloads Last Updated Status
Zenarmor 1.18.6 98 Wednesday, June 4, 2025
Responded

This package has no dependencies.

Discussion for the Zenarmor Package

Ground Rules:

  • This discussion is only about Zenarmor and the Zenarmor package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
  • This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
  • The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
  • Tell us what you love about the package or Zenarmor, or tell us what needs improvement.
  • Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
  • If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
comments powered by Disqus