Unpacking Software Livestream

Join our monthly Unpacking Software livestream to hear about the latest news, chat and opinion on packaging, software deployment and lifecycle management!

Learn More

Chocolatey Product Spotlight

Join the Chocolatey Team on our regular monthly stream where we put a spotlight on the most recent Chocolatey product releases. You'll have a chance to have your questions answered in a live Ask Me Anything format.

Learn More

Chocolatey Coding Livestream

Join us for the Chocolatey Coding Livestream, where members of our team dive into the heart of open source development by coding live on various Chocolatey projects. Tune in to witness real-time coding, ask questions, and gain insights into the world of package management. Don't miss this opportunity to engage with our team and contribute to the future of Chocolatey!

Learn More

Calling All Chocolatiers! Whipping Up Windows Automation with Chocolatey Central Management

Webinar from
Wednesday, 17 January 2024

We are delighted to announce the release of Chocolatey Central Management v0.12.0, featuring seamless Deployment Plan creation, time-saving duplications, insightful Group Details, an upgraded Dashboard, bug fixes, user interface polishing, and refined documentation. As an added bonus we'll have members of our Solutions Engineering team on-hand to dive into some interesting ways you can leverage the new features available!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey Community Coffee Break

Join the Chocolatey Team as we discuss all things Community, what we do, how you can get involved and answer your Chocolatey questions.

Watch The Replays
Chocolatey and Intune Overview

Webinar Replay from
Wednesday, 30 March 2022

At Chocolatey Software we strive for simple, and teaching others. Let us teach you just how simple it could be to keep your 3rd party applications updated across your devices, all with Intune!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey For Business. In Azure. In One Click.

Livestream from
Thursday, 9 June 2022

Join James and Josh to show you how you can get the Chocolatey For Business recommended infrastructure and workflow, created, in Azure, in around 20 minutes.

Watch On-Demand
The Future of Chocolatey CLI

Livestream from
Thursday, 04 August 2022

Join Paul and Gary to hear more about the plans for the Chocolatey CLI in the not so distant future. We'll talk about some cool new features, long term asks from Customers and Community and how you can get involved!

Watch On-Demand
Hacktoberfest Tuesdays 2022

Livestreams from
October 2022

For Hacktoberfest, Chocolatey ran a livestream every Tuesday! Re-watch Cory, James, Gary, and Rain as they share knowledge on how to contribute to open-source projects such as Chocolatey CLI.

Watch On-Demand

Downloads:

16

Downloads of v 2.44.0:

16

Last Update:

10 May 2025

Package Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • ACD Systems

Tags:

acdsee

Downloads:

16

Downloads of v 2.44.0:

16

Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • ACD Systems

Tags:

acdsee photo free

acdsee

Legal Disclaimer: Neither this package nor Chocolatey Software, Inc. are affiliated with or endorsed by ACD Systems. The inclusion of ACD Systems trademark(s), if any, upon this webpage is solely to identify ACD Systems goods or services and not for commercial purposes.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Some Checks Have Failed or Are Not Yet Complete

Not All Tests Have Passed


Validation Testing Passed


Verification Testing Passed

Details

Scan Testing Resulted in Flagged as a Warning:

At least one file within this package has between 5 and 10 detections

Details
WARNING

This package was rejected on 25 Jun 2025. The reviewer chocolatey-ops has listed the following reason(s):

ZongkokNiuB (maintainer) on 10 May 2025 16:40:51 +00:00:

User 'ZongkokNiuB' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2025 17:15:50 +00:00:

acdsee has failed automated validation.

Requirements

Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.

  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip, etc) have been included without including a LICENSE.txt file. This file is required when including binaries More...
  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included without including a VERIFICATION.txt file. This file is required when including binaries More...
Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • The iconUrl should be added if there is one. Please correct this in the nuspec, if applicable. More...
  • The licenseUrl should be added if there is one. Please correct this in the nuspec, if applicable. More...
  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow packageSourceUrl, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...
  • Release Notes (releaseNotes) are a short description of changes in each version of a package. Please include releasenotes in the nuspec. NOTE: To prevent the need to continually update this field, providing a URL to an external list of Release Notes is perfectly acceptable. More...
  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Suggestions

Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.

  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow more information related to the software. More... Please consider adding one or more of the following to the nuspec, if available:
    • docsUrl - points to the location of the wiki or docs of the software
    • mailingListUrl - points to the forum or email list group for the software
    • bugTrackerUrl - points to the location where issues and tickets can be accessed
    • projectSourceUrl - points to the location of the underlying software source
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...
  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

ZongkokNiuB (maintainer) on 10 May 2025 18:24:20 +00:00:

User 'ZongkokNiuB' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2025 18:55:40 +00:00:

acdsee has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • The iconUrl should be added if there is one. Please correct this in the nuspec, if applicable. More...
  • The licenseUrl should be added if there is one. Please correct this in the nuspec, if applicable. More...
  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow packageSourceUrl, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...
  • Release Notes (releaseNotes) are a short description of changes in each version of a package. Please include releasenotes in the nuspec. NOTE: To prevent the need to continually update this field, providing a URL to an external list of Release Notes is perfectly acceptable. More...
  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Suggestions

Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.

  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow more information related to the software. More... Please consider adding one or more of the following to the nuspec, if available:
    • docsUrl - points to the location of the wiki or docs of the software
    • mailingListUrl - points to the forum or email list group for the software
    • bugTrackerUrl - points to the location where issues and tickets can be accessed
    • projectSourceUrl - points to the location of the underlying software source
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...
  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2025 19:30:34 +00:00:

acdsee has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/7736ae40d562a8cb8c0649590e445c88 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2025 21:36:25 +00:00:

acdsee has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 6 and 10 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This package version cannot be approved without an exemption from a Moderator.

flcdrg (reviewer) on 21 May 2025 11:55:24 +00:00:

Please resolve these to allow this package to be approved:

  • tools\VERIFICATION.txt should contain instructions on how the user can independently verify that the embedded file is the same as available for download from the original site.
  • tools\LICENSE.txt should contain the text of the software license. This must also permit redistribution for the software to be embedded in the package.
  • If you are the software author, please confirm that via a comment here. Alternatively, if you are not the software author, put your own name in the owners field.
  • A high VirusTotal detection score needs to be investigated, for example checking with the software author. Hopefully it is a false positive, but even open source software is not immune. eg. a 'supply chain' attack could compromise an otherwise innocent application. If the total remains in the range 5-10, then you will need to append a note to the description pointing to an official source (such as a GitHub issue with an official response, blog post, wiki page etc.) indicating why there are false positive results for this package.
  • When embedding software with the package, the software license must explicitly allow software redistribution. Either change the package to download the software (instead of embedding it), or contact the sofware author and get written permission to distribute the software via Chocolatey, or for them to alter the license. This permission should be appended to the LICENSE.txt file for reference.

Also, if possible:

  • Add packageSourceUrl to point to where the package source resides
  • If not done already, see if you can add one or more of docsUrl, mailingListUrl, bugTrackerUrl and/or projectSourceUrl with appropriate links.

The license text does not look legitimate - can you clarify where it came from?

thanks,
David

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 Jun 2025 11:59:06 +00:00:

We've found acdsee v2.44.0 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.

Take action:

  • Log in to the site and respond to the review comments.
  • Resubmit fixes for this version.
  • If the package version is failing automated checks, you can self-reject the package.

If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.

Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 25 Jun 2025 12:01:23 +00:00:

Unfortunately there has not been progress to move acdsee v2.44.0 towards an approved status within 15 days after the last review message, so we need to close (reject) the package version at this time. If you want to pick this version up and move it towards approval in the future, use the contact site admins link on the package page and we can move it back into a submitted status so you can submit updates.

Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.

Description

acdsee
Free Version For Study Self-Extract


tools\acdsee.zip
md5: D067B21A19098DC88C1CF8E68E4CE94B | sha1: 39AB5051570B084E12AFA6D65B596C095AA54BEE | sha256: CEEE7D9B3E3281979B77569BAB572878EF6950FEA9BA8730FD85F65E6B732E2B | sha512: A1FE918CF57FCB3A386965530B896604E636685C3877FC14448AFDD07B9C25D633E1B890D34841B48176C9DD373584091281B8D629E5333B7EA0667D84CC58E4
tools\chocolateyinstall.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop';

$packageArgs = @{
  packageName   = $env:ChocolateyPackageName
  unzipLocation = "$(Split-Path -parent $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition)"
  url           = 'C:\ProgramData\chocolatey\lib\acdsee\tools\acdsee.zip'
  url64bit      = 'C:\ProgramData\chocolatey\lib\acdsee\tools\acdsee.zip'
  #file         = $fileLocation

  softwareName  = 'acdsee*' #part or all of the Display Name as you see it in Programs and Features. It should be enough to be unique

  # Checksums are required for packages which will be hosted on the Chocolatey Community Repository.
  # To determine checksums, you can get that from the original site if provided.
  # You can also use checksum.exe (choco install checksum) and use it
  # e.g. checksum -t sha256 -f path\to\file
  checksum      = 'ceee7d9b3e3281979b77569bab572878ef6950fea9ba8730fd85f65e6b732e2b'
  checksumType  = 'sha256' #default is md5, can also be sha1, sha256 or sha512
  checksum64    = 'ceee7d9b3e3281979b77569bab572878ef6950fea9ba8730fd85f65e6b732e2b'
  checksumType64= 'sha256' #default is checksumType
}
Install-ChocolateyZipPackage @packageArgs
tools\LICENSE.txt

Note: Include this file if including binaries you have the right to distribute.
Otherwise delete. this file.

===DELETE ABOVE THIS LINE AND THIS LINE===

From: <insert applicable license url here>

LICENSE

<Insert License Here>


L I C E N S E   A G R E E M E N T

This License Agreement ("Agreement") accompanies
the software and related files
("Software"). By using the Software, you agree
to be bound by all of the terms and conditions
of the Agreement.

The Software is owned by software author ("Author")
and is Copyright (C) 2000-2013 software author. You
are allowed to use this software for free. You
may install the Software on any number of
storage devices, like hard disks, memory sticks
etc. and are allowed to make any number of
backup copies of this Software.

The Software is distributed "as is", without
warranty of any kind, expressed or implied,
including, but not limited to warranty of
fitness for any particular purpose. In no event
will the Author be liable to you for any
special, incidental, indirect, consequential or
any other damages caused by the use, misuse, or
the inability to use of the Software, including
any lost profits or lost savings, even if Author
has been advised of the possibility of such
damages. In particular, the Author is not
responsible for any damages caused by the use of
third-party plugins attached to the Software.

You are not allowed to modify, decompile,
disassemble or reverse engineer the Software
except and only to the extent that such activity
is expressly permitted by applicable law. You
are not allowed to distribute or use any parts
of the Software separately. You may make and
distribute copies of this Software provided that
a) the copy contains all files from the original
distribution and these files remain unchanged;
b) if you distribute any other files together
with the Software, they must be clearly marked
as such and the conditions of their use cannot
be more restrictive than conditions of this
Agreement; and c) you collect no fee (except for
transport media, like CD), even if your
distribution contains additional files.

This Agreement covers only the actual version
of software. All other versions are
covered by similar but separate License
Agreements.
tools\VERIFICATION.txt
VERIFICATION

Verification is intended to assist the Chocolatey moderators and community in verifying that this package's contents are trustworthy.

To verify the integrity of the package, you can check the checksum of the downloaded files against the provided checksums. Here’s how to do it:

    Download the package: Obtain the package from the official Chocolatey repository or the source you trust.
    Calculate the checksum: Use a checksum utility (like certutil on Windows, shasum on macOS, or sha256sum on Linux) to calculate the checksum of the downloaded file. For example:
        On Windows: certutil -hashfile <path_to_file> SHA256
        On macOS/Linux: shasum -a 256 <path_to_file>
    Compare the checksums: Ensure that the calculated checksum matches the one provided in this package. If they do not match, do not proceed with the installation.

If you are the software author, you can mention that the checksums are generated from the original files hosted on your official website or repository. This ensures that users can trust the integrity of the files they are downloading.

Example Checksum:

    SHA256: abc123... (replace with actual checksum)

For further verification, you can also refer to the official documentation or website of the software vendor.

Feel free to modify the template as needed to fit your specific package and verification process!

Log in or click on link to see number of positives.

In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).

Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.

Add to Builder Version Downloads Last Updated Status

This package has no dependencies.

Discussion for the acdsee Package

Ground Rules:

  • This discussion is only about acdsee and the acdsee package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
  • This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
  • The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
  • Tell us what you love about the package or acdsee, or tell us what needs improvement.
  • Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
  • If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
comments powered by Disqus