Unpacking Software Livestream

Join our monthly Unpacking Software livestream to hear about the latest news, chat and opinion on packaging, software deployment and lifecycle management!

Learn More

Chocolatey Product Spotlight

Join the Chocolatey Team on our regular monthly stream where we put a spotlight on the most recent Chocolatey product releases. You'll have a chance to have your questions answered in a live Ask Me Anything format.

Learn More

Chocolatey Coding Livestream

Join us for the Chocolatey Coding Livestream, where members of our team dive into the heart of open source development by coding live on various Chocolatey projects. Tune in to witness real-time coding, ask questions, and gain insights into the world of package management. Don't miss this opportunity to engage with our team and contribute to the future of Chocolatey!

Learn More

Calling All Chocolatiers! Whipping Up Windows Automation with Chocolatey Central Management

Webinar from
Wednesday, 17 January 2024

We are delighted to announce the release of Chocolatey Central Management v0.12.0, featuring seamless Deployment Plan creation, time-saving duplications, insightful Group Details, an upgraded Dashboard, bug fixes, user interface polishing, and refined documentation. As an added bonus we'll have members of our Solutions Engineering team on-hand to dive into some interesting ways you can leverage the new features available!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey Community Coffee Break

Join the Chocolatey Team as we discuss all things Community, what we do, how you can get involved and answer your Chocolatey questions.

Watch The Replays
Chocolatey and Intune Overview

Webinar Replay from
Wednesday, 30 March 2022

At Chocolatey Software we strive for simple, and teaching others. Let us teach you just how simple it could be to keep your 3rd party applications updated across your devices, all with Intune!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey For Business. In Azure. In One Click.

Livestream from
Thursday, 9 June 2022

Join James and Josh to show you how you can get the Chocolatey For Business recommended infrastructure and workflow, created, in Azure, in around 20 minutes.

Watch On-Demand
The Future of Chocolatey CLI

Livestream from
Thursday, 04 August 2022

Join Paul and Gary to hear more about the plans for the Chocolatey CLI in the not so distant future. We'll talk about some cool new features, long term asks from Customers and Community and how you can get involved!

Watch On-Demand
Hacktoberfest Tuesdays 2022

Livestreams from
October 2022

For Hacktoberfest, Chocolatey ran a livestream every Tuesday! Re-watch Cory, James, Gary, and Rain as they share knowledge on how to contribute to open-source projects such as Chocolatey CLI.

Watch On-Demand

Downloads:

74

Downloads of v 0.8.2:

74

Last Update:

15 Nov 2019

Package Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • Rafal Zawadzki and Katia Krupchenko

Tags:

deerportal pagan game multiplayer

Deer Portal

Downloads:

74

Downloads of v 0.8.2:

74

Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • Rafal Zawadzki and Katia Krupchenko

Deer Portal

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Some Checks Have Failed or Are Not Yet Complete

Not All Tests Have Passed


Validation Testing Passed


Verification Testing Passed

Details

Scan Testing Resulted in Flagged:

This package was submitted (and approved) prior to automated virus scanning integration into the package moderation processs.

We recommend clicking the "Details" link to make your own decision on installing this package.

Details
WARNING

This package was rejected on 31 Dec 2019. The reviewer chocolatey-ops has listed the following reason(s):

devcarpet (maintainer) on 20 Oct 2019 16:50:41 +00:00:

User 'devcarpet' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Oct 2019 17:24:22 +00:00:

deerportal has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • The iconUrl should be added if there is one. Please correct this in the nuspec, if applicable. More...
  • The licenseUrl should be added if there is one. Please correct this in the nuspec, if applicable. More...
  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow packageSourceUrl, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...
  • Release Notes (releaseNotes) are a short description of changes in each version of a package. Please include releasenotes in the nuspec. NOTE: To prevent the need to continually update this field, providing a URL to an external list of Release Notes is perfectly acceptable. More...
Suggestions

Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.

  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow more information related to the software. More... Please consider adding one or more of the following to the nuspec, if available:
    • docsUrl - points to the location of the wiki or docs of the software
    • mailingListUrl - points to the forum or email list group for the software
    • bugTrackerUrl - points to the location where issues and tickets can be accessed
    • projectSourceUrl - points to the location of the underlying software source
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

devcarpet (maintainer) on 20 Oct 2019 18:01:46 +00:00:

User 'devcarpet' (maintainer) submitted package.

devcarpet (maintainer) on 20 Oct 2019 18:11:12 +00:00:

User 'devcarpet' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Oct 2019 18:44:38 +00:00:

deerportal has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • The licenseUrl should be added if there is one. Please correct this in the nuspec, if applicable. More...
  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow packageSourceUrl, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...
  • Release Notes (releaseNotes) are a short description of changes in each version of a package. Please include releasenotes in the nuspec. NOTE: To prevent the need to continually update this field, providing a URL to an external list of Release Notes is perfectly acceptable. More...
Suggestions

Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.

  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow more information related to the software. More... Please consider adding one or more of the following to the nuspec, if available:
    • docsUrl - points to the location of the wiki or docs of the software
    • mailingListUrl - points to the forum or email list group for the software
    • bugTrackerUrl - points to the location where issues and tickets can be accessed
    • projectSourceUrl - points to the location of the underlying software source
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Oct 2019 19:41:11 +00:00:

deerportal has failed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/2a8e27bdf158d17443a3c3a68abbe9ac for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

devcarpet (maintainer) on 20 Oct 2019 21:04:42 +00:00:

User 'devcarpet' (maintainer) submitted package.

devcarpet (maintainer) on 20 Oct 2019 21:05:35 +00:00:

User 'devcarpet' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Oct 2019 21:40:04 +00:00:

deerportal has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow packageSourceUrl, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 20 Oct 2019 23:09:39 +00:00:

deerportal has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/6a723c42650b7ca60804574f1c21fa8d for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

flcdrg (reviewer) on 10 Nov 2019 09:08:46 +00:00:

Please resolve these to allow this package to be approved:

  • Remove tools\chocolateybeforemodify.ps1 as it isn't being used
  • If you are the software author, please confirm that via a comment here. Alternatively, if you are not the software author, put your own name in the owners field.
  • Run the PowerShell code to remove comments from scripts

Also, if possible:

  • Add packageSourceUrl to point to where the package source resides

thanks,
David

devcarpet (maintainer) on 10 Nov 2019 20:59:00 +00:00:

Hello, thank you for the feedback.

Please find my answers below:

devcarpet (maintainer) on 10 Nov 2019 20:59:17 +00:00:

User 'devcarpet' (maintainer) submitted package.

devcarpet (maintainer) on 10 Nov 2019 21:00:10 +00:00:

User 'devcarpet' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 Nov 2019 21:35:08 +00:00:

deerportal has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow packageSourceUrl, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 Nov 2019 22:46:38 +00:00:

deerportal has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/e5fa04e5c9e9490f978590326cbc4475 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

Pauby (reviewer) on 14 Nov 2019 15:23:19 +00:00:

Hi, a couple of issues / suggestions / questions:

  1. The <owners> field is for the Package owners and should be your name / Chocolatey username. Can you amend this?
  2. The <projectUrl> results in a 404 page. Can you fix this?
  3. Please add a <bugTrackerUrl>;
  4. Please amend the <copyright> field - it should look something like Copyright (c) 2019 Rafal Zawadzki & Katia Zawadzka which would match the license;
  5. In your chocolateyInstall.ps1 you are downloading the ZIP file and then using Install-ChocolateyZipPackage - is there a reason you are not just using Install-ChocolateyZipPackage to download and install the file in one?
  6. If you are not using the $handbook variable in the chocolateyInstall.ps1 can you remove it?
  7. Can you remove the blank lines at the top of your chocolateyUninstall.ps1?
  8. Can you remove the LICENSE.txt and VERIFICATION.txt as they are only needed if you are embedding the software inside the package;

Thanks.

devcarpet (maintainer) on 15 Nov 2019 20:34:49 +00:00:

Hello,

thanks for another feedback.

  1. Done
  2. Done
  3. Done
  4. Done
  5. No any particular reason. It is not a blocker, right? I want to avoid another tests etc.
  6. Done
  7. Done
  8. Done

devcarpet (maintainer) on 15 Nov 2019 20:37:15 +00:00:

User 'devcarpet' (maintainer) submitted package.

devcarpet (maintainer) on 15 Nov 2019 20:42:17 +00:00:

Hello,

thanks for another feedback.

  1. Done
  2. Done
  3. Done
  4. Done
  5. No any particular reason. It is not a blocker, right? I want to avoid another tests etc.
  6. Done
  7. Done
  8. Done

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 15 Nov 2019 21:17:01 +00:00:

deerportal has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
Congratulations! This package passed automatic validation review without flagging on any issues the validator currently checks. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 15 Nov 2019 21:21:09 +00:00:

deerportal has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/c0da485eb8847491fbd140e1bb642118 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

Pauby (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2019 15:23:23 +00:00:

Hi,

The reason I asked about point 5 is that if you are using the Chocolatey helpers for a local file then you should use Get-ChocolateyUnzip (see the second line on https://chocolatey.org/docs/helpersinstallchocolateyzippackage) and not Install-ChocolateyUnzip.

You can do it either way but you'd be better doing it in one step than 2.

With regards to it not being a blocker, as this is a new package we want to make sure it's correct before going forward.

Thanks.

devcarpet (maintainer) on 19 Nov 2019 20:46:23 +00:00:

Hello,

thank you for the another feedback. I am running a bit out of time, so I guess for now I will relax with my package, since it becomes more time consuming then game development itself :-)

Cheers.

Pauby (reviewer) on 20 Nov 2019 10:47:54 +00:00:

No problem. You can always pick it up when you have more time.

devcarpet (maintainer) on 23 Nov 2019 10:19:08 +00:00:

I will wait for docs update and more clear specification how to validate and moderation will be more structured.

Please feel free to ping with update (I don't want to follow recommendation in comments but rather original specification). Thanks, RafaƂ.

Pauby (reviewer) on 26 Nov 2019 11:35:51 +00:00:

Hi,

All moderation is done through the comments here rather than direct messaging. The moderation documentation is being rewritten and as it stands at the moment is not exhaustive. This is not going to be a quick process.

Let us know when you are ready to pick up the package again.

Thanks.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 16 Dec 2019 11:38:23 +00:00:

We've found deerportal v0.8.2 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.

Take action:

  • Log in to the site and respond to the review comments.
  • Resubmit fixes for this version.
  • If the package version is failing automated checks, you can self-reject the package.

If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.

Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 31 Dec 2019 11:42:18 +00:00:

Unfortunately there has not been progress to move deerportal v0.8.2 towards an approved status within 15 days after the last review message, so we need to close (reject) the package version at this time. If you want to pick this version up and move it towards approval in the future, use the contact site admins link on the package page and we can move it back into a submitted status so you can submit updates.

Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.

Description

The game takes place in an ancient world where the Almighty Deer God is protecting all the compassionate creatures.


tools\chocolateyinstall.ps1
$tools = Split-Path $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition
$content = Join-Path (Split-Path $tools) 'tools/DeerPortal-0.8.2'
$classic = Join-Path $content 'DeerPortal.exe'
$classic_shortcut = Join-Path ([System.Environment]::GetFolderPath('CommonPrograms')) 'Deer Portal Game.lnk'

Get-ChocolateyWebFile -PackageName 'deerportal' -FileFullPath "$tools\DeerPortal-0.8.2.zip" -Url 'https://github.com/deerportal/deerportal/releases/download/v0.8.2/Windows-DeerPortal-0.8.2.zip'

Install-ChocolateyZipPackage 'deerportal' "$tools\DeerPortal-0.8.2.zip" "$(Split-Path -parent $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition)"

Install-ChocolateyShortcut `
    -ShortcutFilePath $classic_shortcut `
    -WorkingDirectory $content `
    -TargetPath $classic
tools\chocolateyuninstall.ps1



$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop';
$packageArgs = @{
  packageName   = $env:ChocolateyPackageName
  softwareName  = 'deerportal*'
  fileType      = 'EXE_MSI_OR_MSU'
  silentArgs    = "/qn /norestart"
  validExitCodes= @(0, 3010, 1605, 1614, 1641)
}

$uninstalled = $false
[array]$key = Get-UninstallRegistryKey -SoftwareName $packageArgs['softwareName']

if ($key.Count -eq 1) {
  $key | % { 
    $packageArgs['file'] = "$($_.UninstallString)"
    
    if ($packageArgs['fileType'] -eq 'MSI') {
      $packageArgs['silentArgs'] = "$($_.PSChildName) $($packageArgs['silentArgs'])"
      
      $packageArgs['file'] = ''
    } else {
    }

    Uninstall-ChocolateyPackage @packageArgs
  }
} elseif ($key.Count -eq 0) {
  Write-Warning "$packageName has already been uninstalled by other means."
} elseif ($key.Count -gt 1) {
  Write-Warning "$($key.Count) matches found!"
  Write-Warning "To prevent accidental data loss, no programs will be uninstalled."
  Write-Warning "Please alert package maintainer the following keys were matched:"
  $key | % {Write-Warning "- $($_.DisplayName)"}
}

$classic_shortcut = Join-Path ([System.Environment]::GetFolderPath('CommonPrograms')) 'Deer Portal Game.lnk'


Remove-Item -Path $classic_shortcut -Force | Out-Null




Log in or click on link to see number of positives.

In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).

Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.

Add to Builder Version Downloads Last Updated Status

0.8.2 Windows Fall Update

  • Package submitted to Chocolatey https://chocolatey.org/packages/deerportal
  • FPS Counter showing in the not NDEBUG
  • Release number showing in the not NDEBUG
  • TriangleFan instead of Quads (for Raspberry PI)
  • Added Windows Icon for the exe file
  • Added icon for the Game Window

This package has no dependencies.

Discussion for the Deer Portal Package

Ground Rules:

  • This discussion is only about Deer Portal and the Deer Portal package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
  • This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
  • The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
  • Tell us what you love about the package or Deer Portal, or tell us what needs improvement.
  • Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
  • If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
comments powered by Disqus