Downloads:
18
Downloads of v 0.11.0:
18
Last Update:
16 May 2025
Published Date:
16 May 2025
Package Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- Armourstill
Tags:
base64- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Software Source
- Package Specific:
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
gbase64
(Ready for review)
- 1
- 2
- 3
0.11.0 | Updated: 16 May 2025
- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Software Source
- Package Specific:
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
Downloads:
18
Downloads of v 0.11.0:
18
Published:
16 May 2025
Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- Armourstill
Tags:
base64gbase64 0.11.0
(Ready for review)
Legal Disclaimer: Neither this package nor Chocolatey Software, Inc. are affiliated with or endorsed by Armourstill. The inclusion of Armourstill trademark(s), if any, upon this webpage is solely to identify Armourstill goods or services and not for commercial purposes.
- 1
- 2
- 3
All Checks are Passing
3 Passing Tests
This version is in moderation and has not yet been approved. This means it doesn't show up under normal search.
- Until approved, you should consider this package version unsafe - it could do very bad things to your system (it probably doesn't but you have been warned, that's why we have moderation).
- This package version can change wildly over the course of moderation until it is approved. If you install it and it later has changes to this version, you will be out of sync with any changes that have been made to the package. Until approved, you should consider that this package version doesn't even exist.
- You cannot install this package under normal scenarios. See How to install package version under moderation for more information.
- There are also no guarantees that it will be approved.
There are versions of this package awaiting moderation (possibly just this one). See the Version History section below.
Extra features
--url, -u
: encode/decode with URL format, defined in RFC 4648--no-padding, -n
: encode with no-padding mode
md5: 6F1F7954F99AAE233C476CB13D5C193D | sha1: AD178B2B902F7EC6F3E9E668EEF95889D8269361 | sha256: A2B4AC5E23BB23D6C307FB8F1AAFC330205AD6A2C6940205266EC7BC6DB979B6 | sha512: FB044B00B182B470B49B784E2AA9D1579AFFED5E6B0FAE3C18AFFA89D4579EF2A7912B93AC3EF7CA0A65C44FC69038F3D5D3A4A605B9943417B21DAB7F4828EA
The contents of this folder were downloaded as follows:
- From: https://github.com/armourstill/gbase64/releases/download/v0.11.0/gbase64-v0.11.0.windows.amd64.zip
- SHA256: A2B4AC5E23BB23D6C307FB8F1AAFC330205AD6A2C6940205266EC7BC6DB979B6
This file was created by armourstill package maintainer.
Log in or click on link to see number of positives.
- gbase64.0.11.0.nupkg (391f2164d7c8) - ## / 67
- gbase64-v0.11.0.windows.amd64.zip (a2b4ac5e23bb) - ## / 66
- gbase64.exe (c6193b17c9b9) - ## / 70
In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).
Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.
This package has no dependencies.
Ground Rules:
- This discussion is only about gbase64 and the gbase64 package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
- This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
- The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
- Tell us what you love about the package or gbase64, or tell us what needs improvement.
- Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
- If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
Armourstill (maintainer) on 15 May 2025 13:15:37 +00:00:
User 'Armourstill' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 15 May 2025 13:50:24 +00:00:
gbase64 has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
Armourstill (maintainer) on 16 May 2025 03:22:57 +00:00:
User 'Armourstill' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 16 May 2025 03:57:18 +00:00:
gbase64 has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 16 May 2025 09:16:22 +00:00:
gbase64 has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/0582f96a4be9b7688f1ebb434f0df28c for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 16 May 2025 10:43:17 +00:00:
gbase64 has passed automated virus scanning.