Downloads:
34
Downloads of v 3.1.1:
34
Last Update:
26 Aug 2022
Package Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- Jean-Michaël Celerier
- Nicolas Vuaille
- Akané Lévy
- Jaime Chao
- Antoine Villeret
- Simon Jamain
- Pia Baltazar
- and many more
Tags:
ossia-score sequencer digital art interaction installationsossia-score
Downloads:
34
Downloads of v 3.1.1:
34
Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- Jean-Michaël Celerier
- Nicolas Vuaille
- Akané Lévy
- Jaime Chao
- Antoine Villeret
- Simon Jamain
- Pia Baltazar
- and many more
ossia-score
Legal Disclaimer: Neither this package nor Chocolatey Software, Inc. are affiliated with or endorsed by Jean-Michaël Celerier, Nicolas Vuaille, Akané Lévy, Jaime Chao, Antoine Villeret, Simon Jamain, Pia Baltazar, and many more. The inclusion of Jean-Michaël Celerier, Nicolas Vuaille, Akané Lévy, Jaime Chao, Antoine Villeret, Simon Jamain, Pia Baltazar, and many more trademark(s), if any, upon this webpage is solely to identify Jean-Michaël Celerier, Nicolas Vuaille, Akané Lévy, Jaime Chao, Antoine Villeret, Simon Jamain, Pia Baltazar, and many more goods or services and not for commercial purposes.
- 1
- 2
- 3
All Checks are Passing
3 Passing Tests
This package was rejected on 17 Nov 2022. The reviewer chocolatey-ops has listed the following reason(s):
ossia score is a sequencer for audio-visual artists, designed to enable the creation of interactive shows, museum installations, intermedia digital artworks, interactive music and more in an intuitive user interface.
It allows to sequence OSC, MIDI, DMX, sound files and more, between multiple software and hardware. Its novel interactive timeline enables scores written with it to depend on external events and controls through a simple visual language.
ossia score is free, libre and open source software and runs on desktop (Windows / macOS / Linux), mobile and embedded. It leverages libossia for its implementation, as well as reputed open-source technologies such as Qt 5, Boost and LLVM. It is written primarily in modern C++.
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop';
$packageArgs = @{
packageName = $env:ChocolateyPackageName
softwareName = 'ossia-score*'
fileType = 'exe'
silentArgs = '/S'
}
[array]$key = Get-UninstallRegistryKey -SoftwareName $packageArgs['softwareName']
if ($key.Count -eq 1) {
$key | % {
$packageArgs['file'] = "$($_.UninstallString)"
if ($packageArgs['fileType'] -eq 'MSI') {
$packageArgs['silentArgs'] = "$($_.PSChildName) $($packageArgs['silentArgs'])"
$packageArgs['file'] = ''
} else {
}
Uninstall-ChocolateyPackage @packageArgs
}
} elseif ($key.Count -eq 0) {
Write-Warning "$packageName has already been uninstalled by other means."
} elseif ($key.Count -gt 1) {
Write-Warning "$($key.Count) matches found!"
Write-Warning "To prevent accidental data loss, no programs will be uninstalled."
Write-Warning "Please alert package maintainer the following keys were matched:"
$key | % {Write-Warning "- $($_.DisplayName)"}
}
Log in or click on link to see number of positives.
- ossia-score.3.1.1.nupkg (968b621369c2) - ## / 63
- ossia.score-3.1.1-win64.exe (d603753edd97) - ## / 65
In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).
Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.
2021 ossia
This package has no dependencies.
Ground Rules:
- This discussion is only about ossia-score and the ossia-score package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
- This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
- The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
- Tell us what you love about the package or ossia-score, or tell us what needs improvement.
- Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
- If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
sschiesser (maintainer) on 25 Aug 2022 08:34:49 +00:00:
User 'sschiesser' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 25 Aug 2022 09:10:26 +00:00:
ossia-score has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
sschiesser (maintainer) on 25 Aug 2022 09:46:49 +00:00:
User 'sschiesser' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 25 Aug 2022 10:22:08 +00:00:
ossia-score has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
sschiesser (maintainer) on 26 Aug 2022 07:27:21 +00:00:
User 'sschiesser' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 26 Aug 2022 08:00:48 +00:00:
ossia-score has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
sschiesser (maintainer) on 26 Aug 2022 09:00:33 +00:00:
User 'sschiesser' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 26 Aug 2022 09:34:49 +00:00:
ossia-score has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
sschiesser (maintainer) on 26 Aug 2022 13:55:31 +00:00:
User 'sschiesser' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 26 Aug 2022 14:26:23 +00:00:
ossia-score has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 26 Aug 2022 14:54:28 +00:00:
ossia-score has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/57b3b10a33bd5de23a817ae5ac83b208 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 26 Aug 2022 15:52:07 +00:00:
ossia-score has passed automated virus scanning.
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 13 Oct 2022 03:50:33 +00:00:
Hi, there are some items that should be addressed:
packageSourceUrl
is for a link to the source for the Chocolatey package (e.g. the.nuspec
,chocolateyinstall.ps1
, etc), not for a link to where the source code for the software is. Use theprojectSourceUrl
to link to where the source code for the software is.projectSourceUrl
is not for a direct download link, it is for a link to where the source code for the software is.Regards, TheCakeIsNaOH
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 02 Nov 2022 03:55:25 +00:00:
We've found ossia-score v3.1.1 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.
Take action:
If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.
Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 Nov 2022 03:57:14 +00:00:
Unfortunately there has not been progress to move ossia-score v3.1.1 towards an approved status within 15 days after the last review message, so we need to close (reject) the package version at this time. If you want to pick this version up and move it towards approval in the future, use the contact site admins link on the package page and we can move it back into a submitted status so you can submit updates.
Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.