Unpacking Software Livestream

Join our monthly Unpacking Software livestream to hear about the latest news, chat and opinion on packaging, software deployment and lifecycle management!

Learn More

Chocolatey Product Spotlight

Join the Chocolatey Team on our regular monthly stream where we put a spotlight on the most recent Chocolatey product releases. You'll have a chance to have your questions answered in a live Ask Me Anything format.

Learn More

Chocolatey Coding Livestream

Join us for the Chocolatey Coding Livestream, where members of our team dive into the heart of open source development by coding live on various Chocolatey projects. Tune in to witness real-time coding, ask questions, and gain insights into the world of package management. Don't miss this opportunity to engage with our team and contribute to the future of Chocolatey!

Learn More

Calling All Chocolatiers! Whipping Up Windows Automation with Chocolatey Central Management

Webinar from
Wednesday, 17 January 2024

We are delighted to announce the release of Chocolatey Central Management v0.12.0, featuring seamless Deployment Plan creation, time-saving duplications, insightful Group Details, an upgraded Dashboard, bug fixes, user interface polishing, and refined documentation. As an added bonus we'll have members of our Solutions Engineering team on-hand to dive into some interesting ways you can leverage the new features available!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey Community Coffee Break

Join the Chocolatey Team as we discuss all things Community, what we do, how you can get involved and answer your Chocolatey questions.

Watch The Replays
Chocolatey and Intune Overview

Webinar Replay from
Wednesday, 30 March 2022

At Chocolatey Software we strive for simple, and teaching others. Let us teach you just how simple it could be to keep your 3rd party applications updated across your devices, all with Intune!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey For Business. In Azure. In One Click.

Livestream from
Thursday, 9 June 2022

Join James and Josh to show you how you can get the Chocolatey For Business recommended infrastructure and workflow, created, in Azure, in around 20 minutes.

Watch On-Demand
The Future of Chocolatey CLI

Livestream from
Thursday, 04 August 2022

Join Paul and Gary to hear more about the plans for the Chocolatey CLI in the not so distant future. We'll talk about some cool new features, long term asks from Customers and Community and how you can get involved!

Watch On-Demand
Hacktoberfest Tuesdays 2022

Livestreams from
October 2022

For Hacktoberfest, Chocolatey ran a livestream every Tuesday! Re-watch Cory, James, Gary, and Rain as they share knowledge on how to contribute to open-source projects such as Chocolatey CLI.

Watch On-Demand

Downloads:

8,410

Downloads of v 2025.1.12:

47

Last Update:

12 Jan 2025

Package Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • nekohasekai

Tags:

sing-box

Downloads:

8,410

Downloads of v 2025.1.12:

47

Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • nekohasekai

sing-box

Legal Disclaimer: Neither this package nor Chocolatey Software, Inc. are affiliated with or endorsed by nekohasekai. The inclusion of nekohasekai trademark(s), if any, upon this webpage is solely to identify nekohasekai goods or services and not for commercial purposes.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Some Checks Have Failed or Are Not Yet Complete

Not All Tests Have Passed


Validation Testing Passed


Verification Testing Passed

Details

Scan Testing Resulted in Flagged as a Warning:

At least one file within this package has between 5 and 10 detections

Details
WARNING

This package was rejected on 03 Apr 2025. The reviewer Pauby has listed the following reason(s):

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 06:14:18 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 06:16:32 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 06:33:22 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 06:47:56 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 07:00:35 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 07:34:24 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • ProjectUrl and ProjectSourceUrl are typically different, but not always. Please ensure that projectSourceUrl is pointing to software source code or remove the field from the nuspec. More...
  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 07:39:55 +00:00:

sing-box has failed automated package testing (verification).
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/fe9c42d69d109e4d59939150a0ceeb5e for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.

  • NEW! We have a test environment for you to replicate the testing we do. This can be used at any time to test packages! See https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment
  • Please log in and leave a review comment if you have questions and/or comments.
  • If you see the verifier needs to rerun testing against the package without resubmitting (a issue in the test results), you can do that on the package page in the review section.
  • If the verifier is incompatible with the package, please log in and leave a review comment if the package needs to bypass testing (e.g. package installs specific drivers).
  • Automated testing can also fail when a package is not completely silent or has pop ups (AutoHotKey can assist - a great example is the VeraCrypt package).
  • A package that cannot be made completely unattended should have the notSilent tag. Note that this must be approved by moderators.

Windos (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 08:02:17 +00:00:

Rerunning verification testing after testing environment issue resolved.
Verification Status Change - Verification tests have been set to rerun.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 08:11:38 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 08:21:05 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/8a45792b0b07aff1808aea65d370ed3c for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 08:44:30 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • ProjectUrl and ProjectSourceUrl are typically different, but not always. Please ensure that projectSourceUrl is pointing to software source code or remove the field from the nuspec. More...
  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 09:02:31 +00:00:

sing-box has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 6 and 10 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This package version cannot be approved without an exemption from a Moderator.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 09:55:26 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 10:23:24 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 10:45:23 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 11:20:17 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • ProjectUrl and ProjectSourceUrl are typically different, but not always. Please ensure that projectSourceUrl is pointing to software source code or remove the field from the nuspec. More...
  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 11:29:46 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/2c985ffe20bb45e113897162b67f7ef1 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 11:30:28 +00:00:

sing-box has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 6 and 10 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This package version cannot be approved without an exemption from a Moderator.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 11:59:30 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 12:35:26 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • ProjectUrl and ProjectSourceUrl are typically different, but not always. Please ensure that projectSourceUrl is pointing to software source code or remove the field from the nuspec. More...
  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 12:59:14 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/a1993e4ec27d4c6de4c86d850ecf873e for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 13:00:42 +00:00:

sing-box has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 6 and 10 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This package version cannot be approved without an exemption from a Moderator.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 13:13:05 +00:00:

> sing-box has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.

It seems that the result was based on an old cached file.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 12 Jan 2025 23:21:45 +00:00:

User 'nonedotblue' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Jan 2025 23:54:20 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • ProjectUrl and ProjectSourceUrl are typically different, but not always. Please ensure that projectSourceUrl is pointing to software source code or remove the field from the nuspec. More...
  • Title (title) matches id exactly. Please consider using something slightly more descriptive for the title in the nuspec. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The PackageSourceUrl element in the nuspec file should be a valid Url. The reviewer will ensure the specified Url is valid. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 13 Jan 2025 00:05:26 +00:00:

sing-box has passed automated package testing (verification). The next step in the process is package scanning.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/choco-bot/efbcd907ee8146da7f800175de7ee6d5 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 13 Jan 2025 00:11:36 +00:00:

sing-box has been flagged as part of automated virus scanning.
Package virus scanning found that at least 1 file within, or downloaded by, the package has between 6 and 10 VirusTotal detections associated with it.
This package version cannot be approved without an exemption from a Moderator.

nonedotblue (maintainer) on 13 Mar 2025 03:24:42 +00:00:

Please reject this version

Pauby (reviewer) on 03 Apr 2025 10:51:51 +00:00:

Rejected as per maintainers request.
Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.

Description

The universal proxy platform,which uses JSON for configuration files.


tools\chocolateybeforemodify.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'

Get-Process -Name 'sing-box' -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Stop-Process
tools\chocolateyinstall.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'

$toolsDir = "$(Split-Path -parent $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition)"

if (Test-Connection -ComputerName google.com -Quiet -Count 1) {
  $url64 = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ycycxz/sing/refs/heads/main/sing.zip"
}
else {
  $url64 = "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/ycycxz/sing@main/sing.zip"
}

$checksum64 = "12289aceb1736dce283e1182beb97375effcfdec86c529e9d119a97ee5d4dd55"
Install-ChocolateyZipPackage $packageName $url64 -checksum64 $checksum64 -UnzipLocation $toolsDir


Log in or click on link to see number of positives.

In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).

Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.

Add to Builder Version Downloads Last Updated Status
sing-box 1.11.13 102 Sunday, June 8, 2025 Approved
sing-box 1.11.11 111 Sunday, May 18, 2025 Approved
sing-box 1.11.10 81 Wednesday, May 7, 2025 Approved
sing-box 1.11.9 45 Thursday, May 1, 2025 Approved
sing-box 1.11.7 109 Wednesday, April 9, 2025 Approved
sing-box 1.11.6 27 Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Approved
sing-box 1.11.5 142 Tuesday, March 11, 2025 Approved
sing-box 1.11.4 97 Monday, February 24, 2025 Approved
sing-box 1.11.3 38 Saturday, February 22, 2025 Approved

This package has no dependencies.

Discussion for the sing-box Package

Ground Rules:

  • This discussion is only about sing-box and the sing-box package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
  • This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
  • The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
  • Tell us what you love about the package or sing-box, or tell us what needs improvement.
  • Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
  • If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
comments powered by Disqus