Downloads:
108
Downloads of v 2.6.6:
108
Last Update:
02 Oct 2020
Package Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- thempb
Tags:
surfshark vpn- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Software License
- Package Specific:
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
surfshark (Install)
- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Software License
- Package Specific:
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
Downloads:
108
Downloads of v 2.6.6:
108
Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- thempb
surfshark (Install)
Legal Disclaimer: Neither this package nor Chocolatey Software, Inc. are affiliated with or endorsed by thempb. The inclusion of thempb trademark(s), if any, upon this webpage is solely to identify thempb goods or services and not for commercial purposes.
- 1
- 2
- 3
Some Checks Are Exempted or Have Failed
Not All Tests Have Passed
Validation Testing Failed
Verification Testing Exemption:
Scan Testing Resulted in Flagged:
This package was submitted (and approved) prior to automated virus scanning integration into the package moderation processs.
We recommend clicking the "Details" link to make your own decision on installing this package.
This package was rejected on 04 Dec 2020. The reviewer chocolatey-ops has listed the following reason(s):
Secure your digital life
Private access to the open internet.
Access content safely
Enjoy everything good that the internet has to offer, worry-free. Get instant, secured access to all the content you love.
Leave no footprints
Use Surfshark to make sure your location is private and your sensitive data is secure, at all times. Verified security
“To sum up, Cure53 is highly satisfied to see such a strong security posture on the Surfshark VPN extensions, especially given the common vulnerability of similar products to privacy issues.”
start-process -filepath "C:\ProgramData\Caphyon\Advanced Installer\{9E65D7E5-B255-493D-B95A-DECAB307DDF6}\SurfsharkSetup.exe" -argumentlist '/x {9E65D7E5-B255-493D-B95A-DECAB307DDF6} AI_UNINSTALLER_CTP=1 /qn'
Note: Include this file if including binaries you have the right to distribute.
Otherwise delete. this file.
===DELETE ABOVE THIS LINE AND THIS LINE===
From: <insert applicable license url here>
LICENSE
<Insert License Here>
Note: Include this file if including binaries you have the right to distribute.
Otherwise delete. this file. If you are the software author, you can change this
mention you are the author of the software.
===DELETE ABOVE THIS LINE AND THIS LINE===
VERIFICATION
Verification is intended to assist the Chocolatey moderators and community
in verifying that this package's contents are trustworthy.
<Include details of how to verify checksum contents>
<If software vendor, explain that here - checksum verification instructions are optional>
Log in or click on link to see number of positives.
- SurfsharkSetup.exe (27760b0dd1b6) - ## / 72
- SurfsharkSetup.exe (f1236a602fc3) - ## / 69
- surfshark.2.6.6.nupkg (ddf0afa13a63) - ## / 62
- SurfsharkSetup.exe (c46e44fa0ed9) - ## / 68
- SurfsharkSetup.exe (6d8b5c90eccf) - ## / 70
In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).
Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.
This package has no dependencies.
Ground Rules:
- This discussion is only about surfshark (Install) and the surfshark (Install) package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
- This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
- The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
- Tell us what you love about the package or surfshark (Install), or tell us what needs improvement.
- Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
- If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 05 Jul 2020 14:27:04 +00:00:
surfshark has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 05 Jul 2020 16:10:04 +00:00:
surfshark has failed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/29da6a00e6ad2f976ddc6a7cd0999e7e for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 25 Jul 2020 16:14:54 +00:00:
We've found surfshark v2.6.6 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.
Take action:
If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.
Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 25 Jul 2020 18:32:53 +00:00:
surfshark has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 25 Jul 2020 19:33:11 +00:00:
surfshark has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 25 Jul 2020 20:14:10 +00:00:
surfshark has failed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/94e0a7b8c67040c618f168ef03b56ec1 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 14 Aug 2020 20:18:38 +00:00:
We've found surfshark v2.6.6 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.
Take action:
If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.
Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.
thempb (maintainer) on 29 Aug 2020 12:21:26 +00:00:
User 'thempb' (maintainer) submitted package.
thempb (maintainer) on 29 Aug 2020 12:24:45 +00:00:
User 'thempb' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 29 Aug 2020 13:00:15 +00:00:
surfshark has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 30 Aug 2020 15:05:10 +00:00:
surfshark has failed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/725e3f34b49935ff9c9f4c8dba669920 for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.
thempb (maintainer) on 04 Sep 2020 10:21:46 +00:00:
User 'thempb' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 04 Sep 2020 10:56:00 +00:00:
surfshark has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 04 Sep 2020 19:09:10 +00:00:
surfshark has failed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/f18560a238c3b797d80c662809d83b3e for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 24 Sep 2020 19:09:41 +00:00:
We've found surfshark v2.6.6 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.
Take action:
If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.
Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.
thempb (maintainer) on 02 Oct 2020 18:51:01 +00:00:
User 'thempb' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 02 Oct 2020 19:26:04 +00:00:
surfshark has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
mkevenaar (reviewer) on 30 Oct 2020 10:30:28 +00:00:
Auto Validation Change - Validation tests have been set to rerun.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 30 Oct 2020 10:34:42 +00:00:
surfshark has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 02 Nov 2020 09:30:16 +00:00:
surfshark has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Nov 2020 10:34:40 +00:00:
We've found surfshark v2.6.6 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.
Take action:
If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.
Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 04 Dec 2020 10:36:00 +00:00:
Unfortunately there has not been progress to move surfshark v2.6.6 towards an approved status within 15 days after the last review message, so we need to close (reject) the package version at this time. If you want to pick this version up and move it towards approval in the future, use the contact site admins link on the package page and we can move it back into a submitted status so you can submit updates.
Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.